ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare postoperative analgesic effect of flurbiprofen axetil and parecoxib sodium in patients with humeral shaft fracture in painless ward.Methods:All of 200 hospitalized humeral fractures patients were retrospectively studied in the painless ward of the Forth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2017 to September 2019 , the clinical effects of flurbiprofen axetil and parecoxib were compared.Results:Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after 3 d of two groups of patients were significantly lower, compared with preoperative results: (4.26±0.96) scores vs. (6.09±1.38) scores, (4.04±1.19) scores vs. (6.04±1.11) scores, and the differences were statistical significantly ( P<0.01). Postoperative VAS score after 3 d of two groups had no statistical significance ( P>0.05). Two groups had different degree of adverse reactions after operation, and flurbiprofen axetil group had singnificant gastrointestinal adverse reaction: 22 patients vs. 3 patients( P<0.05). The number of patients in the parecoxib group were more than that in the flubiprofen axetil group without troubled sleep: 20 patients vs. 8 patients. Two groups of patients were satisfied with the pain care during hospitalization. Conclusions:Two analgestic drugs can obtain obvious analgesic effect in the treatment of bones surgery. The side effects and sleep disturbance in the flurbiprofen axetil group are higher than those in the parecoxib group. Good pain control can improve patients satisfaction with pain care.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the methods and clinical effect of lateral less invasive stabilization system(LISS)plate combined with medial buttress plate in distal femoral fractures patients with comminuted medial cortex.Methods The clinical data of 25 distal femoral fractures patients with comminuted medial cortex from June 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and all patients were treated with lateral LISS plate combined with medial buttress plate. According to the AO fracture classification,A3 type was in 10 cases,C2 type was in 9 cases,and C3 type was in 6 cases.The knee joint function at 3,6 and 12 months after operation was evaluated according to American hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee joint function score, and the clinical effect was evaluated 12 months after operation.Results The patients were followed up 18-36 months,with an average of 23.4 months.The operation time was (80 ± 22) min, intraoperative bleeding was (395 ± 56) ml, and the average hospitalization time after operation was 5.6 d.All patients got bone union,and the bone union time was 16-30 months,with an average of 18.7 months.All patients had no incision infection,no fracture and delayed union.The HSS knee joint function scores at 3,6 and 12 months were(84.3 ± 7.8),(89.3 ± 7.2) and(97.9 ± 4.3)scores.The incidence of complications was 24%(6/25),and the excellent and good rate was 84%(21/25).Patients felt satisfied.Conclusions The clinical effect of lateral LISS plate combined with medial buttress plate in distal femoral fractures patients with comminuted medial cortex is good.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Some studies have shown that the double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not superior to the single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and stil has some deficiencies difficult to overcome. Which is better, double-bundle reconstruction or single-bundle reconstruction? There is no uniform conclusion. OBJECTIVE:To perform a prospective cohort study on the clinical efficacy and safety of autologous single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS:Totaly 81 patients with posterior cruciate ligament injury were randomly divided into single-bundle reconstruction group (n=41) and double-bundle reconstruction group (n=40). The knee stability, Lysholm score, Tegner score, hospital stay, operation time, fever days and number of puncture cases were compared between the two groups before and 24 months after reconstruction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Compared with the single-bundle reconstruction group, the knee stability was significantly worse in the double-bundle reconstruction group (F=4.362,P=0.000); the operation time, hospital stay and number of puncture cases were also higher in the double-bundle reconstruction group (P 0.05). These findings indicate that both single- and double-bundle reconstruction under arthroscopy is safe and effective treatment for posterior cruciate ligament injury, but the double-bundle reconstruction is not recommended as the preferred surgical procedure because of longer time and larger trauma.